Friday, January 29, 2010

Hands on With the IPad

Unlike the iPhone, which Apple kept under such tight guard at its introduction that only a few special types got to touch it for a few minutes, there were iPads aplenty available immediately following the product's introduction Wednesday. As a result, members of the media--including the three of us--were able to spend roughly half an hour with our eyes glued to the iPad (and, when the crowd of media members abated, our fingers on the iPad). Here's an eyewitness account of what we noticed.

What's on the outside

The iPad does indeed feel like an oversized novelty iPhone. In fact, it's a bit of a mix of the first-generation iPhone (aluminum back) and the 3G/3GS models (the back is gently curved, not flat). But it's much bigger and squarer than the iPhone. In fact, the iPad's 1024-by-768-pixel display conforms to the 4:3 aspect ratio common on TV sets before they all became widescreen, flat-panelled HDTV marvels. This might seem like a step backward, since all of your favorite widescreen videos will play with black bars at the top and the bottom. But after holding the iPad, it sort of makes sense. A more elongated device, with a 16:9 aspect ratio, might not feel as well-balanced in the hand as the iPad feels.

Speaking of how the iPad feels in your hand: It's comfortable. The iPad's large bezel (i.e., the screenless border at the edge of the device) is there so that you can grip it without landing your thumbs all over its touch-sensitive screen. At 1.5 pounds, it's more than twice as heavy as Amazon's Kindle 2, and it's larger too (9.56-by-7.4-inches). It remains to be seen if it'll be comfortable to hold this device up with a hand as you're commuting on the bus or train. But in our short time hefting it, it seemed surprisingly thin and light, given its size.

Despite Apple's widely known dislike for physical buttons, the company still hasn't figured out how to completely wipe them from existence. The iPad has the same buttons as the iPhone: an indented Home button directly below the screen, a Sleep/Wake button at the top, a silencer toggle switch, and a volume up/down rocker switch. Other than that, the outside of the device is pretty barren: there's a headphone jack, a tiny internal microphone (located right next to the headphone jack), a speaker, and the same dock connector port that we've come to expect from every mobile device from Apple.

Now, a bit more about that screen. It's based on tried-and-true LCD technology, backlit by an LED and using IPS display technology--in other words, it's basically the same kind of screen that's in the current iMac line. By using an LED backlight, Apple is able to make the iPad screen quite bright, and the IPS technology means that the screen has an extremely wide viewing angle.

Since the screen's narrowest dimension is 768 pixels, you'd think that the iPad would be able to play back 720p high-definition video--and it can. However, it's important to keep in mind that 720p video generally is 1280 pixels wide by 720 pixels high. Such an image would actually be displayed on the iPad at 80 percent size: 1024 pixels wide (the width of the iPad display's longest side) by 576 pixels high. Or, if you double-tapped to zoom in on the image, it would play at the HD resolution, but with the sides of the image cut off. (This is the dark side of Apple using a 4:3 display in an era of 16:9 video content--the screen just doesn't fit the content.)

That all said, the video we played--clips of movies ("Star Trek" and "Up") and TV Shows ("30 Rock")--looked great. Big and beautiful, with vibrant colors and impressive viewing angles.

Tapping around

The iPads Apple showed off on Wednesday came pre-loaded with a bunch of apps. Not only were there new iPad versions of old favorites--Contacts, Music, Videos, Calendar, Safari, iPod--but there were also a bunch of current iPhone apps running in the iPad's app compatibility mode.

To start using the iPad, you have to unlock it. And yes, there's a "slide to unlock" screen just as on the iPhone and iPod touch. On the iPad, you don't need to slide from one end of the larger screen to another--the slide area is right in the middle of the screen, but it's only a couple of inches wide. This screen looks more or less like the iPhone's unlock screen, but there's a new button located just to the right of the slide-to-unlock space. Tap this button and you'll activate the iPad's built-in slideshow mode. Clearly Apple has designed this feature in anticipation of the iPad being placed in a position of prominence in living rooms everywhere, because the slideshow turns the iPad into a dynamic digital photo frame. (And yes, the iPad is still locked while it's displaying the slideshow--press the home button and the familiar slide-to-clock interface will reappear.)

Once you unlock the iPad, you'll find yourself at the home screen. It's a lot like the iPhone's, though it's not plain black anymore--you can place a wallpaper image behind the app icons. At the bottom of the screen is space for six (versus four on the iPhone) of your favorite apps, sitting on a transparent glass tray just like the one you'll find in Mac OS X Leopard and Snow Leopard.

We found the home screen a little bit weird, though. Despite the size of the iPad's screen, you can only place four app icons on each row of the home screen. The result is an incredibly spaced-out icon grid. And it's somewhat disappointing that this new device, which generally seems to take great advantage of its large screen, doesn't really do anything different when it comes to the home screen. It's like a big, spaced-out version of the iPhone home screen (and somewhat reminiscent of the Nexus One and other Android-based devices).

Each of the iPhone apps Apple has been revised for the iPad feature more depth, graphical richness, and complexity than its predecessor. Take Safari, which on the iPad is an amalgam of the iPhone and Mac versions of Apple's browser. Safari on the iPad loads pages extremely fast, and they look great. Double-tapping zooms in just as you'd get on an iPhone, and panning around with your finger is smooth. But up at the top of the screen is a single toolbar featuring forward and back buttons, access to bookmarks, and more. Tap on the Windows button, and the browser window is replaced with a screen showing a tiled view of nine pages. At various points you'll discover the existence of a Bookmarks Toolbar, just as in the Mac version of Safari. And tapping on the Bookmarks icon doesn't take you to a separate list of bookmarks as it does on the iPhone--instead, a floating bookmarks window appears right over where you tapped.

Mail, too, brings to mind aspects of both the iPhone and the Mac. When viewed in landscape orientation, the iPad Mail app is segmented into separate panes like Mail on the Mac: a list of messages on the left side, and a view of the currently-selected message on the right. In portrait mode, however, it looks very similar to the view you get when reading a single message in the iPhone's Mail client--the Inbox listing is then relegated to a pop-up pane that appears when you tap the Inbox control in the top left. In both cases, the message-list view is the same familiar style we've become accustomed to on the iPhone.

While the iPad doesn't have a built-in camera, it does have a slightly revised Photos application that lets you sort through stacks of your photos (based on albums or, if you're syncing with iPhoto, Events, Places, and Faces). You can quickly peek at the contents of any of those stacks by using the pinch gesture, which spreads out the photos in the stack to let you glance at thumbnails of all of them. Release the pinch and those thumbnails quickly snap back into the pile.

Like the iPod touch, the iPad separates music and video playback into separate apps. The iPod app looks much more like the Mac version of iTunes than the iPhone version. There's a controller at the top with play, next, and previous buttons, a slider to control where you are within the track, and a volume slider. On the left side there's even a source list, letting you choose between music, podcast, and audiobooks, and playlists. On the right side, you can view tracks and select what you want to play.

The graphic richness of many of the iPad apps was striking. Both the Calendar and Contacts app feel like you're peering into a physical object--a dayplanner and address book, respectively. And the extra screen space means that the Calendar is quite versatile, displaying two views at once or showing you the week at a glance. It's much prettier than iCal, that's for sure. Even Notes has gotten a bit of a spruce-up, with a faux leather border, extra marbled texture on the title bar, and an index card list of all your current notes.

We tried typing by using the iPad's virtual keyboard in both the Mail and Notes apps. It's hard to judge the experience after only a few minutes, but we have some reservations. Unless you've got large hands, you won't be able to type by holding the iPad with two hands and tapping with your thumbs--the device is fairly wide. We weren't able to test out the method Steve Jobs seems to prefer, which is to plop the thing in your lap and type on it that way. We were able to set the iPad on a table and type on it in widescreen mode, and managed to write a sentence that bore no resemblance to what we thought we were typing. But it takes time to adapt to any new input device--think back to how odd the iPhone's on-screen keyboard felt when it debuted in 2007--and it's possible that with a little practice, typing on the iPad will be as easy or easier than typing on the iPhone. While the larger size of the keyboard seems promising, the layout is still slightly smaller than a MacBook's full-size keyboard. It felt a bit cramped, like a keyboard that you might find on one of the netbooks Steve Jobs seems to dislike so much. But we have to reserve judgment until we spend more time with the device.

We also got a chance to play with an app making its debut on the iPad--iBooks. Combined with Apple's new iBookstore, iBooks is Apple's answer to the Kindle/Nook/insert other e-book reader name here--you'll be able to purchase and download books to the iPad and read them using the iBooks app. Book pages have a depth to them, with shadows that mimic the curve of pages protruding from the spine and more. The text was clear and the spacing between lines was wide enough that it seems like it will be comfortable for extending reading (although, for some reason, all the text was justified to stretch across the whole screen). There were also two buttons in the upper-right corner when reading a book. One brings up a menu that lets you increase or decrease the font size of your text as well as choose from several different display fonts. The other button, a Spotlight-like magnifying glass that's theoretically meant for initiating search capabilities, wasn't working on the units we tested. You navigate through pages by tapping on the left or right side of the screen, or can drag your finger as if turning a page on a real book to 'flip' from one page to the next.

We tried a few iPhone apps on the iPad, as well, and they worked just fine. You have two choices when running iPhone apps on the iPad: you can run them "actual size," as a pixel-for-pixel match for the iPhone's screen. In this mode, the iPad screen goes black, and the app runs in the center of the screen, surrounded by the image of a bezel that shows you where the iPhone screen border would be. To be honest, it's a really weird experience, and it's kind of a pain to have to reach all the way to the center of the iPad in order to tap.

If you prefer, you can tap the small 2X button in the bottom-right corner of the screen, at which point the iPad will double the size of the app. This scale-up basically doubles every pixel on the screen, so what you end up with is a somewhat chunky, blocky version of the iPhone app. And at iPad sizes, all the interface elements on iPhone apps are enormous. You start to feel like you actually are using an oversized novelty iPhone.

Neither approach is likely to be good for many uses other than gaming. Developers of iPhone apps will want to download that new software-development kit and get those iPad versions ready for the product's release in late March.

All in all, the iPad impressed us with its speed and fluidity. Using Safari was a pleasure, not just because it was fast, but because the screen's so big that it loads full-size Webpages (as opposed to simplified, mobile-ready versions) like you're used to seeing on a computer. Many of the other apps impressed us with their graphic richness and attention to detail. Yes, this product is still 60 days away from shipping to customers and we did find a few rough edges that we hope will be smoothed out, but overall we were impressed by just how deep and refined the iPad apps were.

Judge an iPad by its cover

During his presentation, Steve Jobs talked about three accessories that Apple was going to make available for the iPad: a charging dock, a dock/keyboard combo, and a protective case. At the back of the demo area, there was a row of Keyboard Docks--basically a modern Apple USB keyboard grafted onto the front of an iPad dock. Because of the size of the iPad, the combo doesn't look as ridiculous as, say, an iPhone would connected to the same keyboard.

The $70 Keyboard Dock is an interesting beast. The location of the iPad's dock-connector port means that you'll have to dock it in portrait mode. The keyboard has no function keys, per se, but instead the top row is populated by keys that perform certain tasks on the iPad. There's a Home key, which automatically takes you back to the home screen. Unfortunately, it's placed in the same location as the Escape key on Mac keyboards, meaning that if you reflexively hit Escape on your Mac--to cancel out of a dialog box, for example--you are going to find yourself exiting to the home screen a bit more often than you'd like. The other keys are Spotlight (which takes you to the Spotlight screen), Brightness up and down, Slideshow, Keyboard (which, confusingly, appears to slide the virtual keyboard up and down), a set of music playback controls like those on Mac keyboards, and Lock (which locks your iPad).

The keyboard dock comes with control, option, and command keys as well--and yes, they do seem to work in various iPad apps. Presumably iPad app developers can bind keyboard shortcuts to certain actions, which will mean that keyboard power-users should be able to use keyboard shortcuts to perform some tasks that they might otherwise need to reach up to the iPad screen to perform. That's good, because shifting between keyboard-typing mode and touchscreen-tapping mode is actually quite annoying. At the moment, using the iPad's interface via the keyboard felt incomplete--certain interface elements were just not accessible using the keyboard--but as the device is still two months away from shipping, Apple still has time to work out the kinks.

While at the event, we confirmed with several Apple spokespeople that Apple's Bluetooth wireless keyboard will also work with the iPad. So if you'd prefer to use some other sort of stand or dock, but still type on your iPad, you'll be able to.

We also saw--and got to handle--some iPads housed in Apple's own $40 iPad case. (It's got a big gray Apple logo on the front, in case you forget who makes it.) The case itself seemed like it was made out of vinyl with a soft-touch finish, and has cutouts to expose the various ports and buttons on the outside of the iPad. What's cool about it is that the case is designed to not only protect the iPad, but also to prop it up in various ways to make the iPad easier to watch or use. Flip the front all the way around and you've got a stand that holds the iPad upright in landscape mode, so you can watch a movie, for example, without having to hold it for extended periods of time. Or tip it over and you end up with a wedge that elevates the back to make on-screen typing a tad more ergonomic. As nice a case as it is, we'll wager that by the time the iPad ships, every iPod and iPhone accessory company you've heard of (and a hundred more you haven't) will have created alternatives, many of them cheaper. (In fact, we've already seen several press releases from companies announcing upcoming iPad accessories including cases, so stay tuned.)

So should you buy it?

Spending less than an hour with a preproduction iPad is not enough time for us to form final judgments on a product like this. What we can say is that the product looks good, its screen is bright and beautiful with an impressive viewing angle, we were impressed with the iPad-specific apps, and the addition of the keyboard to the iPhone OS mix is intriguing. We're a little unsure about holding the 1.5-pound device in our hands for extended periods of time and skeptical about the general utility of iPhone app-compatibility mode; we're also disappointed that the 4:3 screen ratio means a lot of pixels will be wasted when you're viewing widescreen video content.

Is the iPad a lust-worthy gadget? We say yes, definitely. We'd love to test drive one on our couch right now. But the product's not done yet. Once Apple has tightened all the screws, sanded off the rough edges, and sent it out into the world, we'll spend some quality time with it and come up with a better perspective on what it does well, where it falls down, and who it's for.

The iPad: I Don't Get It

Good grief. Yesterday's breathless blogging would have you thinking the technology world has been changed forever with the new Apple iPad. So let me go on the record with a contrarian viewpoint. The iPad seems like an interesting device, but I can't see where it fits into most personal or business IT needs.

After the blood-in-the-water, Tiger shark-like frenzy leading up to the unveiling of Apple's new tablet this week, it's understandable that you might feel, well, a tad underwhelmed. Even the Apple rumor mill can't peg every nut and bolt, so there's always something that was touted by the gossip, but didn't show in the real deal.

No, the iPad -- a name that's struck some as offensive -- doesn't make popcorn. It won't recharge by setting it in a sunny spot. It won't even run Flash, for cryin' out loud.

What will it do? What's inside? And most important, what's it going to cost?

Surprisingly, there were some surprises yesterday when Apple CEO Steve Jobs -- still looking thin but no longer sickly gaunt -- showed off the iPad, beginning with its price, which was lower than most had predicted.

To get going, we've answered some of the first round of questions about what Jobs called "magical" and "revolutionary," but which a lot of pundits called much more mundane.

How much will it cost? $499 at the bottom, $829 at the top, with four more configurations in between.

Here's the deal ... the iPad comes in two models: One with WiFi connectivity only, the second with both WiFi and 3G. For each model there are three configurations based on the amount of flash RAM storage.

The WiFi-only models costs $499, $599 and $699 for the 16GB, 32GB and 64GB configurations, respectively. Add $130 to each of those prices for the WiFi+3G model and you get $629, $729 and $829.

Some experts have said the $130 surcharge for 3G is "ridiculous," noting that a 3G chipset adds less than $10 to the materials cost of the iPad. Other hardware in the model, such as GPS, would add a few more dollars.

When can I get one? Apple's saying "late March" for the WiFi-only model, "late April" for the WiFi+3G iPad. And no, you can't order one yet.

The company isn't taking pre-orders at the moment. Instead, Apple's only accepting names and e-mail addresses, which it will use to notify customers when the online store is ready to take credit card numbers.

I've heard some say the iPad is fast. What's that about? The tablet's powered by what CEO Steve Jobs yesterday called an "Apple A4" processor, which he also acknowledged was Apple-designed. Jobs didn't come out and say it, but everyone is assuming that the chip was created by P.A. Semi, the Santa Clara, Calif. boutique microprocessor design company Apple acquired in 2008.

Apple's tablet, the iPad
Apple's tablet, the iPad, is a device that fits between a smartphone and a laptop, said CEO Steve Jobs.

The Apple A4, said Aaron Vronko, CEO of Rapid Repair, a firm that services Apple's mobile hardware, is actually a "system-on-a-chip" (SoC) that almost certainly includes the a single-core ARM Cortex-A9 processor running at 1GHz. According to Vronko, that means the iPad is on average 85%-90% faster than the iPhone 3GS at executing code, and in some instances may be twice as fast.


How big is the thing? Can I hold it in one hand? The 9.7-in. screen sets the format of the iPad, which by Apple's measurements, is 9.6-in. high by 7.5-in. wide by 0.5-in. deep.

Since it weighs in at 1.5 pounds -- Amazon's Kindle is a 10.2-oz. device, the larger Kindle DX, which has a screen the same size as the iPad, weighs 1.2 pounds -- several of the reporters and bloggers who got some hands-on time yesterday said they thought it was too heavy to hold long in one hand.

"That's too much to hold up to your face while holding a strap when you're riding the subway," said Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research yesterday.

"You notice the heft as soon as you pick it up," chimed in Computerworld blogger Seth Weintraub, who had the iPad in his hands Wednesday. "It feels like you've ripped the top off a MacBook Pro and added some thickness to it."

How big is the screen? Apple stuck in a 9.7-in. LCD display with LED-backlighting that uses IPS (in-plane switching) technology. The latter provides wider viewing angles, and was also used in the revamped iMacs that debuted last October.

The iPad's screen resolution is 1024-by-768 pixels, and to many's surprise, that's the standard television 4:3 aspect ratio (the width-to-height ratio), not the nearly-default widescreen format of 16:9 or 16:10 used in notebooks and computer displays today. Apple's new iMacs, for instance, offer a display with a 16:9 aspect ratio, while the company's MacBook notebooks use a 16:10 aspect ratio.

The lack of a widescreen-style display has some pundits ticking off the omission as one of the reasons why the iPad won't sell, or one of the reasons why they won't buy it. The 4:3 ratio has, in fact, made it on a number of "X Things That Suck About the iPad" posts.

How long will the battery last? Apple said 10 hours when viewing video, and a month when the iPad is on stand-by. Other than that, real-world numbers will have to wait until the tablet ships.

But one thing's certain, said Rapid Repair's Vronko: As an e-book reader, the iPad won't be able to touch the Kindle when it comes to time-between-charges.

The Apple iPad docking keyboard
The iPad's $69 docking keyboard is one product some people wish they'd had for their iPhones years ago.
Click to view larger image.

Although Vronko predicted last week that Apple would go with a power-efficient OLED (organic light emitting diode) display rather than an LCD, he was wrong. "I said OLED or a LCD-ePaper hybrid like the one that Pixel Qi is supposed to have in quantity later this year," said Vronko, "because I thought a standard LCD would chew up too much battery life and hinder the usefulness of the tablet as an e-reader."

Apple was thinking different, Vronko admitted. "They said, 'We're going to LCD and forego the battery life," he said.

Unlike the reflective display used by the Kindle -- which Amazon says is good for a week of reading between charges, whatever that means -- the iPad's LCD screen will use as much power when displaying a page from Stephen King's Under the Dome as when handling your e-mail or browsing to EPSN.com.

That means you should be able to read for about 10 hours before having to plug in the iPad again.

What operating system will the iPad run? A modified version of the iPhone OS labeled as version 3.2.

By using the iPhone OS, Apple insures that current iPhone/iPod Touch software runs on the iPad, giving the tablet an instant library of over 140,000 applications. It also means that Apple can add to, rather than have to rework, the multi-touch interface that millions already know how to navigate.

Apple released a beta of the iPhone OS 3.2 SDK (software developers kit) yesterday, giving most developers their first look at the tools and APIs (application programming interfaces) that can be used on the larger-screen iPad.

What's it going to cost me to use an iPad over 3G? Once you've forked over the $130 extra for the 3G-capable model, you'll have to spring for a data plan, too.

In the U.S., AT&T will offer two plans in April when the 3G iPad launches: a $15 per month plan that gives you a 250MB allowance, or an unlimited plan that runs $30 per month. Over the course of a year, then, your iPad 3G access will run between $180 and $360, excluding taxes and fees.

Unlike with the iPhone, there's no contract or commitment requirement; AT&T's iPad plans are pre-paid, and you can ditch the deal at any time.

The iPad is also "unlocked," which means you can insert a SIMM card from another carrier into the tablet. Presumably, that's how most users outside the U.S. will access 3G when the iPad goes on sale in their countries later this year.


Does the iPad support Flash? Nope.

During Wednesday's roll-out, Jobs was browsing on the iPad, and a page came up with a large open space that clearly was where Flash video was to play. The audience twittered, then broke into open laughter.

It's no surprise that the iPad doesn't support Adobe's Flash, since it's running a tweaked iPhone OS -- 3.2, specifically -- and the iPhone notably omits Flash.

Most have put down Apple's Flash-less philosophy to some grudge Jobs holds, although the CEO has claimed that Flash is a processor and battery hog, and unsuitable for a mobile device.

Brad Arkin, Adobe's director for product security and privacy, dismissed those arguments today. In a tweet today, Arkin said, "Upcoming flash player 10.1 will be on 19 of the top 20 smart phones. Handset proc[essor] and mobile network are not issues."

Adrian Ludwig, who works on the Flash team, was more blunt. "It looks like Apple is continuing to impose restrictions on their devices that limit both content publishers and consumers," said Ludwig in an entry on Adobe's Flash platform blog "Without Flash support, iPad users will not be able to access the full range of Web content, including over 70% of games and 75% of video on the Web."

Where's the camera? That's what lots of people want to know.

The iPad, which earlier in the week was rumored to have as many as two cameras -- one facing the user, the other mounted on the back facing away from the user -- lacks a camera.

For many, that's a deal breaker. "If there is a build-in-front-camera [sic] when they start selling ... it would be THE revolutionary, killer video-chat-device and MY MUST-HAVE reason," said an unidentified commenter on a 9to5Mac blog that asked readers to vote on whether they would buy an iPad.



Will We Ever See Flash On the iPad? Probably Not

Steve Jobs pitched the iPad on Wednesday as a device that lets you browse the Web the way it was meant to. Yet his demo of the iPad clearly showed that there wouldn't be any support for Adobe's proprietary Flash platform. Perhaps this was intentional.

The lack of Flash support on the iPhone has been fuelling debates since the smartphone was launched almost three years ago; yet by now, most users agree that the lack of Adobe Flash support for it is not essential to its 3.5-inch multitouch display.

But many find the lack of Flash on the iPad unacceptable, since one of the main aims of the tablet is to browse the Web at its full potential -- without Flash, that is. Adobe has been quick to criticize Apple for the lack of Flash support, saying that more than 70 percent of games and 75 percent of video on the Web runs on it.

CNN, Hulu, Disney, and Farmville are only a few of the thousands of applications that won't work on the iPad -- they all run on Adobe Flash. Yet this is not a surprise. Apple must have a really good reason not to enable Flash on the iPad, both technical and political.

A viable explanation on the lack of Adobe Flash support come from Daring Fireball's John Gruber, who predicted the iPad's incompatibility with Flash before Wednesday's event. To sum it up for you, Adobe Flash on the Mac is resource hog and a leading source of application crashes, and there is a big chance the same would happen on the iPad.

Basically, because Adobe Flash is a proprietary platform, Apple programmers can't fix it or optimize it in case of bugs, Gruber explains. The new in-house designed A4 chip found in the iPad might also have something to do with the lack of Flash on the iPad. Analysts are also predicting the A4 chip will filter down into new iPhone models, expected this summer.

Instead of Adobe Flash though, Apple is banking on the new HTML5 standard, which is still in its early days. YouTube and Vimeo are among the first video services to announce their transition to the new standard, but HTML5 still lacks support for game creation or advanced video features.

IPad might be the future, but without Flash, it could be alienating the present

During the unveiling of the iPad, Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs called it "the best way to browse the Web."

As long as you don't watch Web videos using Flash technology, and that's about 75% of the streamed content online.

Like the iPhone, the iPad won't support Adobe's Flash browser plug-in, which also is used for the majority of games, said the company's group manager of the platform, Adrian Ludwig.

Apple's gadgets might be able to live without Web games -- iPhone apps are generally more fully featured anyway -- but the dearth of video on the iPad is going to hurt. Thanks to a partnership between Apple and Google, YouTube videos can be tapped without Flash on the iPhone and iPad. But everything else -- Vimeo, Funny or Die, Break, Hulu -- is inaccessible.

The iPhone had a good excuse. The hardware wasn't quite up to the speed that a processor-intensive plug-in like Flash requires (despite the iPhone 3GS having "S" for "speed" in its name).

Adobe's Flash Lite is a stripped-down (a nicer way of saying "terrible") version of the plug-in for phones -- an unacceptable replacement and unsupported on the iPhone. Adobe is working with platform makers to create Flash 10 for Google's Android and Palm's WebOS, which powers the Pre and Pixi.

"If you look at makers of smart phones, we're working with 19 of the top 20 makers of smart phones to deliver Flash," Ludwig said.

Hm, wonder who the lone holdout is.

Well, if you can't do everything on your phone, no big deal, right? But for the iPad -- a device billed as "the best way to browse the Web?"

"We'd love to be on the iPad," Ludwig said. "Our goal with the Flash platform is to provide an open, consistent run-time on as many different devices as we possibly can."

Apple isn't reciprocating. In this lover's quarrel, Ludwig and his cohorts are lightening the mood by cracking jokes at the iPad's expense.

During Jobs' presentation when he demoed a few sites, many of those pages -- NYTimes.com and Time.com -- contained blank spaces showing a blue brick graphic (that's the browser saying, Where's my Flash plug-in?) where video players should be.

"I counted five specific instances," Ludwig said. "It was like a two-minute demo. That sort of sums it up.... If you go to a handful of sites, you're not going to find the content you're looking for."

Apple has made several excuses not to include Flash on its mobile platforms. Perhaps Apple's goal is to squeeze out Flash, at least in the Web video space, with HTML5 -- the standardization effort led by Google and Apple engineers.

Ludwig isn't worried. HTML5's video standards have hit brick walls thanks to corporate disagreements, and it doesn't support more advanced Flash effects, like transparent pop-ups and embedded ads. You can see those limitations firsthand in YouTube's HTML5 test version.

Even if content providers learn to live without Flash's video perks (yeah, boo-hoo, no more pre-roll ads), Ludwig says full standardization is still a long way out.

"Standard bodies just move slow," Ludwig said. "HTML5 is probably going to be around standardization in, maybe, 10 years."

If he's right, that's a lifetime in Internet years.

Will the iPad become your pad?

Apple's latest product impresses, but will it replace –or supplement – laptops, phones and other eReaders?

Everyone seems to have an opinion on the iPad. If they don’t, they’re probably working on one.

Steve Jobs with his iPad. Photo: Michael Copeland

But there are two things about the iPad that we all seem to agree on (even the ambivalent among us): The name is ridiculous, and it looks like a huge iPhone.

The latter point reflects some confusion about what the iPad is meant to do. According to Apple (AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs, “iPad creates and defines an entirely new category of devices that will connect users with their apps and content in a much more intimate, intuitive and fun way than ever before.”

While many are surely excited about getting more intimately connected with their apps, others are still left wondering: Where, when and how will I use this device? And what will it replace (if anything)?

To help answer this we talked to a range of folks from the world of digital media for their perspectives.

The Kindle lover

Sean Finnegan, Chief Digital Officer at ad agency Starcom Mediavest, is a frequent flyer who never leaves home without his Amazon (AMZN) Kindle. “It’s my daily routine in the morning,” he says of his eReader habit, which includes everything from the blog Techcrunch to his hometown rag, the Chicago Tribune.

Finnegan praises “the ability to just be on a plane, to kick on the wireless and have all these publications update, for half or a third of the newsstand price.” These factors outweigh what he terms the Kindle's “semi-okay user experience.”

Seemingly a candidate for an upgrade to the iPad, Finnegan acknowledges, “It’s a good leap toward where we want to be.” But he expresses reservations about rebuilding the media library he has on his Kindle, and says, "The price point may give people pause. I don’t foresee lines around the corner at the Apple Store for the iPad.”

The heavy laptop user

Sukhinder Singh Cassidy, an entrepreneur-in-residence at Accel Partners and the former president for Asia-Pacific and Latin American operations at Google, is also a fan of the Kindle—and the iPhone, Blackberry (RIM) and her laptop. She doesn’t predict the iPad will replace any of these devices soon.

“I’m a very heavy laptop user and given the lack of a built-in physical keyboard, I don’t see iPad becoming my netbook or laptop replacement anytime soon,” she wrote in an email. Singh Cassidy sees the iPad being attractive for more casual laptop users, and for those who own neither a netbook nor a Kindle.

The gamer

Voices from the gaming world have a different angle. David Helgason, CEO of Unity Technologies, a startup with a popular platform for developing iPhone games, is thrilled about the possibilities.

“Apple is really taking gaming seriously after all these years,” he says, pointing out that a huge chunk of iPhone app store revenues come from games.

Among the most popular of these games, are those developed by SGN, which claims to have 13.5 million downloads.

SGN CEO and gaming industry veteran Randy Breen notes the opportunities on the downloadable app front for the iPad. But with gaming also finding a home in the browser through Facebook and other platforms, he sees promise there too.

“The tablet looks like a natural thing to use for web browsing,” he explains. Whereas the iPhone’s screen was too small for a full browsing experience, and the laptop required pointing and clicking, Breen says the iPad “really does play a role none of the devices did until now.”

He also thinks the iPad is ideal for all the media multitasking that goes on today. “It’s not unusual for me to have my laptop next to me even if I’m watching TV. I’d much rather have a tablet in my lap.”

The music fan

In another corner of the media world, Clear Channel Radio's (CCMO) president of digital, Evan Harrison, sees potential for augmenting the listening experience. With over five million downloads of its iheartradio app, the company began weeks ago to explore how to take advantage of the iPad's larger screen with more interactivity and rich visuals. “Now it’s a full entertainment and communication device, not just a reading device,” Harrison says, comparing the iPad to the Kindle.

Accel Partners’ Ping Li agrees that the iPad “has lots of use cases beyond just being a reader.” He suggests its potential for replacing two more devices: portable DVD players and personal gaming devices like the Nintendo DS. Li relies on his Blackberry for email and phone calls, and his iTouch for media like games and music. He doesn’t own a Kindle. “If I had to choose, I would get the iPad,” he says unconvincingly. Maybe it’s the name?

iPad may enable new education breakthroughs

Apple yesterday announced the iPad, a new tablet computer that blends e-reader, office software and a general computing device. Its screen measures 9.1 inches on the diagonal, is half an inch thick and weighs in at one and a half pounds. That’s slightly smaller than Amazon’s Kindle DX, which is an apt comparison due to the new iBook app that will ship with the iPad.

At $499, the entry level iPad (16 GB of storage and Wi-Fi) costs $10 more than the Kindle DX and boasts four times the storage capacity of Amazon’s e-reader. Couple the storage improvement with the versatility of the iPad, and it becomes a serious contender for textbooks, text-to-speech applications and other educational uses.

With the announcement of the iPad, Apple also introduced iWork for iPad, which brings the word processing, spreadsheet and presentation capabilities of their office suite to the new tablet. With iBooks and iWork, it’s possible to use the iPad as an all-in-one textbook and notebook. In a lab setting, it would be possible to reference your digital textbook and record your data, all while listening to music from your iTunes library.

The universal access features on the iPad include text-to-speech, as well as the ability to invert display colors for higher-contrast viewing. That creates potential benefits for people with learning differences.

Director of Academic Resources Juli Dunn is optimistic about the possibilities that the iPad holds.

“My prediction is that it will be a huge breakthrough for certain segments of the learning population and I am super-excited to see how it takes off and to what extent it can be utilized to support the principles of universal design learning,” she said.

The iPad should be available in late March.

Apple's iPad vs. Kindle, Eee PC, PSP Go

Here is a philosophical iPad question: What is it? Perhaps the best way to explain the iPad is to call it a jack-of-all-trades. It has all the functionality of the iPod Touch, including gaming, music, and video. But it's also a day planner, e-mail device, Web tablet, e-book reader, digital picture frame, and arguably a netbook replacement. So does this mean the iPad will be replacing any of your digital gear anytime soon? To answer that question lets take a closer look at how it matches up to the competition.

Below is a quick breakdown of the iPad specs against those of the Kindle DX, Asus Eee PC 1005HA and PSP Go. These comparisons might be a little unfair, but all of these products are what you'd call "third space" devices. That is, the piece of hardware you're willing to spend your money on after you've bought a personal computer and a mobile phone. Which one would you buy?

(Click on any of the charts below to enlarge)

iPad vs. Kindle DX

The iPad versus the Kindle DX comes down to this essential question: would you prefer an e-ink display for reading? If you want e-ink because it so closely emulates paper, then the Kindle is the device for you. But if you don't mind an LED-backlit display, you can drill a little deeper.

The Kindle comes with a free 3G data connection, but it'll cost you extra if you do much else other than download books (Amazon charges you for downloading data other than e-books). Amazon's new Global Wireless program also lets you use your Kindle all over the world. Apple's iPad requires a monthly data plan from a carrier that supports micro SIM cards (so far just AT&T in the U.S.). However, you could also opt to do without 3G and stick with Wi-Fi on the iPad.

There's also the question of how many books will be available when the iBookstore launches compared to the Kindle's 400,000-title library. But in addition to iBooks, the iPad should be able to run the Kindle app for the iPhone plus any other e-bookstore iPhone app, which potentially gives the iPad a much larger selection than the Kindle.

iPad vs. Asus Eee PC 1005HA

This matchup is a little ridiculous since the Asus Eee PC 1005HA is a mini-laptop and the iPad just isn't. But if you're looking for a device that's easy to travel with, can get you online, and provides with you a suite of office applications, then the comparison is worth considering. As a netbook, the iPad loses a little in terms of portability, because you'll have to carry around two parts (iPad and keyboard dock), and it's not clear how practical it will be to carry around the keyboard dock.

The iPad also loses on price, screen size, and storage compared to the Asus netbook. But the iPad wins in weight, processor speed, 3G option, and possibly battery life. The biggest downside, however, is that the iPad will only let you operate one program at a time. That might change in the future, but for now the lack of multitasking is a big deficit for the iPad.

iPad vs. PSP Go

Apple has been known to be a little too exuberant about the gaming potential of its devices, but the iPad could find a niche among some gamers. The iPad costs almost twice as much as the PSP Go, but for the extra money you get a bigger screen, better resolution, and faster processor. The PSP Go has more popular titles, more intricate gaming, physical controls, and expandable storage. But the iPad has the better Wi-Fi standard, slightly newer Bluetooth, and a 3G option. The PSP and iPad both have other functions like music, video, photos, and Web browsing, but the iPad's touchscreen and larger display gives it the advantage in these areas.

It's clear the iPad has more flexibility and a few advantages over these competing multi-purpose and single purpose devices, and the price is quite good. But what do you say? Is the iPad the device for you?

Thursday, January 28, 2010

APPLE

Apple Releases iPad SDK In Beta

In announcing the long-awaited iPad Wednesday, Apple released in beta the software development kit needed to build applications for the tablet computer.

The SDK is an upgrade of the current iPhone SDK, beefed up with tools for developing on the iPad. The device, which looks like a very large iPhone, was introduced in San Francisco during a news conference led by chief executive and Apple co-founder Steve Jobs.

The iPhone SDK 3.2 beta is only available for download from Apple's site to members of the iPhone Developer Program. The kit includes software tools for developing apps for the iPhone operating system used in both devices, as well as an iPad simulator.

The simulator, which runs on a Mac with OS X v10.6.2 or later, lets developers lay out their application's user interface for the iPad's 10-inch multi-touch display. In addition, the tool can be used to test an application's memory usage and to shorten the debug cycle in the design process.

Other components of the SDK include an iPad programming guide, as well as guidelines for designing UIs that take advantage of the new views and controls available in the new product. The SDK also includes sample code and documentation for building "universal applications" for the iPad, iPhone and iPod Touch.

The iPhone Developer Program costs $99 per year for the standard membership and $299 for the enterprise membership. The latter program is for companies creating proprietary in-house applications. The membership is aimed at companies with 500 or more employees.

The iPad, which is scheduled to be released in late March, is powered by a system-on-a-chip designed by Apple. The SoC, called A4, helps in boosting the battery life of the product to up to 10 hours, according to Apple.

The Wi-Fi-only iPad will have a starting price of $499. A Wi-Fi and 3G model, which is scheduled to be available in April, will have a starting price of $629. Nearly all of the 140,000 iPhone applications available in Apple's App Store will also run on the iPad, according to Apple.

After the Criticism: Looking at the Positive in the Apple iPad and Reasons to Get One



Reasons to get ipad

Putting it mildly the tech community as a collective set of geeks and bloggers is less than wowed by the iPad. The Wall Street Journal stated that "the last time there was this much excitement about a tablet there was commandments on it," yet I must have missed the 'thou shalt not name your mobile device after feminine hygiene products.' Instead we may have had a simple touch screen netbook in front of us, and in no way worthy of the hype. This is not to say that the Apple iPad is not without its use. In fact it may actually signal a major step forward for mobile computing, even if it is not there yet.

Situations When it Comes in Handy

Reasons to get ipad 2
-The iPad is simply a large iPod Touch, and in this way you may want to simply maximize your iPod Touch use. If you find that the functions of your iPod Touch require both constant internet access and a larger format you may find the iPad the right unity of these needs. Take a look at your iPod Touch use and see if it actually warrants what is really and expensive upgrade.

-The major criticism that is coming out around the iPad is that it is not truly a mobile computer, and instead a mobile device. You still have to sync it to your computer to really get it going and it does not exist autonomously. This is a relative failure for Apple, but it does have its advantages. This can allow the content of your base computer to remain mobile in a way that allows it to still be accessible, even if it is not as much on a regular MacBook.

-All the features of the iPod Touch and iPhone are often too difficult for some people to read and interact with. The iPad makes this a little easier for those who have found the smaller format less accessible. This definitely makes the iPod Touch's function as an electric book reader more plausible, and can be preferable for certain types of games.

-The photo features on the iPad are nice, even if they are not revolutionizing anything. Browsing through these on a large scale touch screen is both responsive and option oriented, which is a major selling point for some people.


Reasons to Get an iPad

Reasons to get ipad 3
-Many people have been waiting for a tablet computer from Apple for quite a long time, and this is the first time they have peeked into this market. It is not perfect, but if you prefer the Mac format and design concepts this may be where you want to go. This is really only going to be true if you are already in the market for a tablet computer, and if you are not do not let the pre-release hype be a deciding factor.

-We cannot walk away from the fact that the iPad is a big iPod, and with that means all the iPod Touch media features are in both a larger format and with a comparable storage space. This means that using the iPad for a portable media player is a nice option. It may be even easier to use for watching videos than a normal MacBook because of its dimensions, and it is still cheaper. Try things like Hulu and Netflix streaming videos on the iPad and you may find that it is great for travel and college dorms.

-Apple has finally unlocked one of their mobile products with the iPad and this may be the most hopeful sign from this dismal release. You are not going to get 3G speeds from from other carriers like T-Mobile because of the specifics of its modem supports, but this does allow for a much more open series of options.

-For a netbook the price of the iPad is not as bad as one might expect. The base 16 GB model is marketed at a mere $499.99, but there is still the hefty models going for over $800. If you want to get a smaller model you are going to find that it does outperform most of its competitors in terms of your bank account. If you are really going to want to use this as a true netbook you are going to have to pay $130 more for each specific model to get the 3G network.

-You really cannot deny how small the iPad truly is. In terms of sex appeal it slams with a width of only a half and inch and a weight clocking in at a stellar pound and a half. This may make it great for constant mobility, but you are going to have to protect that screen.

-For a mobile computer its battery life is fairly impressive, even if it does not have the muscle to go to bat with a real computer. It has a ten hour battery life and can sustain stand by mode for about a month.

-Now that the iTunes' App Store has broken through the 140,000 iPhone applications marker you will find that having equal access to them on the iPad is quite a treat. This has moderate success as you will often find that using them in full screen can get a little resolution problems. Many of the built in applications, such as You Tube and Calendar, actually have been modified to work with the iPad's specific hardware. There is also a new SDK for iPad applications specifically, which may lead to a future of brand new applications with this device in mind.

-There is no way to deny how Brushes works on the iPad, which is beyond anything people could have conceptualized on the iPhone. It is not really different in any significant way on the iPad, but the size really does lend itself to this application.

iPad Device Category

Reasons to get ipad 4
How do you really consider this device? Is it just another PDA like mobile device in the same lineage as the iPod and iPhone? Does it stand alone as its own type of computer, new and removed from the history of mobile computing? To really decide that you have to look at what you get with an iPod Touch and what you expect from a full fledged computer.

In terms of design the iPad takes its aesthetics from the iPhone, but much of the tablet computer model seems to mimic this. Does the iPad do this excessively? In most ways yes, but much of this can also be attributed to the branded design elements that Apple applies to all of their devices. This is part of how Apple has maintained its brand image, which is extended by the way their devices look.

Over all the iPad cannot be referred to simply as a mobile computer because it lacks most of the features and independence that come from a computer. Until the iPad can stand on its own there is no way to put it on par with any laptop available, even at the lower level.

Instead we may need to match the iPad against other netbooks and tablet computers to really see how it stands up. Right now it is not comparing well simply because its based on a mobile device model rather than that of a computer, and in this way it fails as both.

Until the iPad takes its next step in development it is going to have to be seen on its own. There are possibilities for the iPad, especially since it is likely to be in the image of future mobile computers, but it is just not there yet.

We only can say that iPad may be a new device category as a whole and therefore people who plan to buy an eBook reader or a portable media player may get iPad instead. It wasn't clear at first but now it appears that iPad is a big threat to those type of devices which are not a smartphone nor a PC.

Only a certain amount of time will tell if future models and development within the App Store will validate this technology in general. Just wait for the iPad: With Wings, I'm sure Steve Jobs will stand in front of a projection screen to tell you why that release will be even more defining.

How the Apple iPad Could Kill the Kindle

The new Amazon Kindle DX has a few weeks to live—and the magazine and newspaper industries may not have much longer. As soon as Apple unleashes the rumored iPad, Amazon's attempt at hardware design will vanish quicker than Betamax. Amazon won't mind, but magazine and newspaper publishers sure will.

Apple and Amazon could be the best of enemies. Look at their entirely complimentary business strategies. Amazon sells content. The company went into the hardware business to spur more e-book sales. It intends to make a killing selling e-textbooks for the new Kindle DX. Yeah, sure, Amazon makes money on the Kindle, but its heart is in the books. Apple sells hardware. Apple became the world's leading online media store so it could sell more iPods. Its heart is in the iPods.

Enter the iPad. The Apple people usually complain about how much they hate a product category just before they enter it. Recently, Apple's COO Tim Cook said that he thinks netbooks are pretty useless, and that the iPod touch is Apple's netbook. This feeds into BusinessWeek's rumor about the "iPad"—a $699 tablet that would look like a bigger iPod touch.

Apple hates netbooks because netbooks cannibalize notebooks. But the company would love to sell another Apple device into homes. The iPad doesn't replace anything Apple currently sells. You type on your laptop at your desk. You surf with your iPhone while on the go. But you'd relax with an iPad on the couch, prop it up by your bed, or rest it on the airplane tray table. That's all stuff you do with existing devices, of course, but an iPad would make it more natural, just as a Kindle does.

The Kindle's success doesn't come from its brilliant hardware. Yes, the new Kindles are much prettier and slimmer than the original Kindle, but they're compelling because of their 3G networking and their tight integration with Amazon's store. Apple has that integration, too, via the iPhone Kindle app, and it has a much deeper legacy of building multipurpose hardware than Amazon does.

The Kindle DX seems to have three primary markets: textbooks, newspapers, and magazines. Other companies, including Hearst and News Corp., are said to be going into the media pad space to save their magazine subscription dollars. They're doomed. In exchange for your monthly contract, the iPad will give you the whole Internet, and 35,000 iPod touch applications, including—get this!—the Amazon Kindle application.

Amazon won't stress out about this too much. It will still be selling e-books, and now it will be selling e-textbooks, too. The big losers will be newspapers and magazines that hope to sell Kindle subscriptions. They'll be forced to put their free Web sites behind a pay wall or find some other way of making money. Textbook companies and traditional book publishers aren't in so much danger, because they've never offered all of their content online free.

The iPad also won't just be an e-book/Internet reader. It's sure to be a terrific media player—a sort of widescreen iPod, the perfect thing for watching a movie in bed or on the plane. Apple won't position it as a general-purpose computer, as the company doesn't want to cannibalize its MacBook business.

Don't worry too much about the iPad's $699 price. Apple has been open to carrier subsidies, which typically shave $200 or more off the price of a device in exchange for locking you into a contract. That business model has been tremendously successful—so successful that unlocked phones, while available in the U.S., have never been able to take off. Apple has also always had strong relationships with colleges and universities, so we're sure to see educational discounts to promote the iPad as a virtual textbook.

The iPad's monthly fee will be a sticking point, of course, but it's not an insurmountable one. Verizon's new Open Development Initiative has been letting makers of non-voice devices roll their own service plans. The ODI hasn't been used for a big consumer device yet, but it could let Apple roll out an iPad with bucket plans for data at various tiers; an on-device data meter could tell people when it's time to buy more. So far, the ODI hasn't been compatible with subsidies, but Verizon seems to be very enthusiastic about working with Apple; maybe together they could make this work.

The big question is whether Apple will release an iPad at its next big press event on June 8, or whether it will decide to wait. Typically, Apple announces products in June, September-ish and January-ish. It will announce the iPad when it's ready, whenever that is. But Amazon and the magazine companies shouldn't just be preparing competing devices: They should be preparing new business models for the new world where anyone can access Web content on a large-format pad, anywhere, at any time.

A couple of non-techy iPad observations

Unless you live under an internet-free rock, in which case you’re not reading this, you know Apple revealed the iPad yesterday. I’m not going to bother grabbing links and photos of the thing because they’re all over the damn place. But, while listening to live audio in the background while watching pictures being posted from the event, I had several thoughts.

It’s a giant iPod Touch, but with the ability to run big programs (iWork, iPhoto), not just apps. It’s pretty and shiny and new and I’m going to hate being the only kid on the playground who doesn’t have one. But there a couple of reasons why I’m not currently pitching my tent outside an Apple store. (Besides the fact the nearest Apple store is two hours from here.)

Prior to the announcement, I did a little waffling between buying the Macbook and waiting to see if the mythical iPad was really coming soon. (I, like many others, assumed the iPad would go for about $1k.) In the end, it came down to the keyboard. An on-screen touch keyboard is cool and I use the one on the iPod (iPad Mini—heh) a lot, but do I want to write a book that way? Yesterday they demonstrated the keyboard dock which enables you to use an external keyboard, but then it’s a desktop unit. I think it’s a cool toy and will also be a great professional tool for some, but for writers? I have no regrets about going for the Macbook.

There are two things that, as an iPod Touch user, I was looking for in the iPad and didn’t find:

First, support for Flash. Sometimes while browsing the ‘net on the iPod, I get a little blue Lego block that means there’s Flash there my device doesn’t support. In one of the pictures from yesterday’s event, you can see the little blue Lego block on the iPad.

Second—and to me, most importantly—no multitasking. Since not being able to run multiple apps simultaneously on the iPod drives me batshit crazy, I can’t imagine how I’d react to not being able to do it on what’s supposed to be a fully functional device. And, if I remember correctly, that Droid thing or whatever it’s called can run multiple apps, so the technology’s there.

I understand that the apps pick up where you left off. If I’m writing in Docs to Go and I need to look something up in Wikipanion, I have to hit the home button and leave Docs to Go. Pull up Wikipanion and search for the information. Hit the home button and open Docs to Go. Even though it puts the cursor where I left off, if I have to go back and forth a few times, checking things, that’s a pain in the ass. I want to swipe two fingers horizontally across the screen to flip through apps.

I have a feeling I’ll end up with an iPad. How could I not? They’re so shiny. But I’ll probably try to wait until the second generation. Maybe it’ll have multitasking.

Oh, and on a random note, I have no problem with the name. Many people wondered if they had any women in on the naming sessions and the “now with wings” jokes are flying like mad, but that didn’t cross my mind until other people brought it up.

Legal pad.

iPad.

Will the iPad kill Kindle and nuke netbooks?

We didn't quite get a brain-controlled tablet that destroys all our enemies, but that doesn't mean the iPad isn't going to ruin somebody's day. If we ran Amazon.com or made netbooks, we'd be pretty fed up this morning.

Netbooks first. Last summer, Apple COO Tim Cook said "at this point, we don't see a way to build a great product for this $399, $499, this kind of price point unit." That's clearly changed, because of course the iPad starts at $499.

That's bad news for netbook manufacturers, because netbooks are primarily purchased as extra PCs: you've already got a proper computer, but you want something for bashing out the odd email, browsing the web or using on the train.

The problem is that netbooks are essentially cheap laptops, which is both their strength and their weakness: the price is right but they're slow, they've got small screens and they're still PCs - with all the complexity, malware and hassle that entails.

The iPad, on the other hand, has a much bigger screen, is much simpler, is a proper media device, gets 10 hours out of a battery and doubles as an ebook. We wouldn't want to type on it all day, but then we wouldn't want to type on the average netbook all day, either. We've got proper computers for that.

Killing the Kindle

Then there's Amazon. The Kindle is a great product, its books are cheaper, it's lighter, it has better battery life and its e-ink display offers a reading experience that the iPad simply can't match.

But can the Kindle run iPlayer, show Disney movies, high-resolution photos or hardcore pornography (we're not joking about that last one: before Steve Jobs had even finished talking we were getting press releases from adult firms boasting iPad-friendly sex films)?

Could you publish a magazine such as Total Film in Kindle format with embedded video? Can you play first-person shooters or even Peggle on it? The answers are no, no, no, no and no.

As an ebook reader the Kindle has no real rival - but if you want an ebook reader and you can only afford one device, then you need to be a serious bibliophile to choose a Kindle over something that is a pretty good ebook reader, a superb multimedia player, a digital map, a games console and a Web-friendly computer.

Book lovers will stick with the Kindle, but the rest of us will be awfully tempted by the iPad.

With iPad, will size matter?

New York (CNN) -- We were right all along. It's called the Apple iPad, and it's a smallish, $499 computer (for the entry-level model, that is) that can best be described as a big iPhone or iPod touch.

It will be available in 60 days. Apple Inc.'s Steve Jobs made the announcement today in San Francisco, California, an event that had provoked the usual, but always startling, over-the-top anticipation and speculation.

Years from now, maybe people will be asking, "Where were you on January 27, 2010?" in the same way they ask, "Where were you on July 20, 1969, when Apollo 11 first kissed the surface of the moon?"

Luckily for Apple, the marketing writes itself (and is writing itself right now all over Twitter):

Do everything your iPhone can do, only on a larger screen! Zip through photos of your Caribbean vacation without having to squint! Watch iTunes-purchased movies in your bed before going to sleep!

All fun things, sure. But the big question is: Will size matter?

Ever since the iPhone's launch, in 2007, so many people have gotten used to the idea of doing all of that -- zipping through photos, watching videos, reading the latest blog posts, following the play-by-play of the big game, killing time in the elevator with Tetris clones, to say nothing of tweeting -- on its very small, portable, bite-sized screen. We've adjusted. It's functional, and there's no sign people are tiring of it, as the latest sales numbers confirm.

The iPad, which features a 9.7-inch display, couldn't possibly be considered portable. It's one thing to tote around your iPhone with you as you buzz about town, but it's another matter to lug around a near 10-inch behemoth. The iPhone fits in your pocket. You're lucky if the iPad fits inside your pocketbook.

And it's not just the impracticality of it all. HDTVs aside, the consumer electronics industry has successfully driven home the idea that smaller is better: You don't want a desktop PC, you want a notebook. You don't want a notebook, you want a netbook. You don't want a netbook, you want a smartphone that can run hundreds of tiny applications, dubbed "apps." (Even the words get smaller.) And now, perhaps, here's Apple, trying to convince us of the exact opposite, even as the iPhone continues to sell ridiculously well.

The numbers don't lie: Apple sold 8.6 million iPhones in the quarter leading up to December 26, 2009. That's 100 percent growth from the same quarter in 2008. The average company, coming out of the recession, would be thrilled with any growth at all. One-hundred percent growth? Madness.

But Apple isn't just any company. When Apple sneezes, the entire consumer electronics industry not only catches a cold, it has to take a week off from work. Earlier this month, at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada, one of the world's largest consumer electronics trade shows, you'd hear the same phrase repeatedly: How will this device compare with the Apple tablet?

It wouldn't compare, of course, if all we're talking about is the raw technology. But we're not. Apple has never sold the best spec'd devices. Instead, Apple owes its success to selling the best user experiences. After years of telling people that the iPhone represents the best experience money can buy, it may be tricky to do an about-face, and tell these same people, "You know what, actually, this other thing is the best experience."

The company's pedigree speaks for itself. The house that Steve Jobs built -- and saved, with his return in 1997 after a 12-year absence -- created such iconic products as the iMac, iPod, and, of course, the iPhone. All three stole their competitors' lunch money. But this time around, Apple's competition is itself, and you know what they say about a house divided.

The iPad really is "just" a big iPhone (well, iPod touch), isn't it? But that's the whole point. People clearly are keen on the iPhone as it exists today. Which returns us to our central question: When is an upgrade really a downgrade? Are people prepared to sacrifice the portability they get with the iPhone?

I'm skeptical.

The IPad's Five Worst Surprises


My colleague Dan Frakes has chimed in with his take on the five best surprises from the iPad's launch. I'm in total agreement with his list--well, except for the name thing. The iPad's design is elegant, the size seems about right for a device designed to surf the wWeb and handle e-mail and e-book reading. I really want to buy one...

Almost.

Unfortunately, there are a handful of shortcomings with the iPad that I have to think about before I buy the tablet.

No video camera: The lack of a camera surprised me--it almost seems like an intentional omission, so that Apple has something neat to show in "iPad 2.0." A device with a large, gorgeous, full color screen, a 1GHz CPU, wireless and 3G internet access...and no way to hold a video chat? (Or audio chat for that matter--I don't think there's a microphone, either. Perhaps there's one in the headphones, though.)

With a video camera, the iPad could definitely replace the Mac laptop in our family room...but without it, that means I'll need to lug out the laptop anytime grandma wants a video chat with her grandkids. If I have to do that anyway, I might as well just use the laptop in the first place.

No multitasking: If there were a video camera and you could have a video chat with someone, it would be very useful to leave the iPad version of iChat running in the background--otherwise, you'd be quitting and launching it all the time to check if grandma had arrived yet or not. Notifications are nice, but not nearly as nice as simply having the window there all the time.

It'd be pretty simple to design an interface to allow toggling between two running apps; some variant on Exposé, or a three-finger twist-swipe. I'm not talking about full OS X-style multitasking (though that'd be great), but just the ability to keep a key app or two open in the background.

Support for Flash: Let me start by saying this...I have a strong dislike for Flash in general. The fact that it takes up to 80 percent of the CPU in a quad-core 2.66GHz Mac Pro to render a 400x300 Flash game just boggles my mind--full OpenGL games running at 1920x1200 often do so with lower CPU utilization! So yes, I know Flash is a CPU hog. I know it kills battery life. But like it or hate it, Flash is still a large part of the Web experience today for many people--and not just for those seeking Flash games.

Even during casual browsing, the odds are very good that you'll run into a Flash-enhanced (and I use that term loosely) site at some point--heck, it even happened to Steve Jobs today during his presentation! At one point, while a page was loading, the "missing plug-in" icon appeared where a Flash movie would have been playing.

As much as I hate Flash, not supporting it on a device marketed as providing the ultimate portable Web experience is a glaring oversight. You can buy a full-featured (PC or Linux) notebook for less than the cost of a high-end iPad, and for that, you'd get full support for the Web and all its conventions--even those that Apple doesn't want to support.

Bite the bullet, Apple, and find a way to enable Flash on the iPad. I don't like it, I really don't want it, but there are times I want to view a site that uses it, so I need it in order to make the iPad fully usable as the ultimate Web surfing machine.

True GPS only available only with 3G model: This bit should be footnoted with an I think disclaimer, because Apple's iPad specs page isn't very clear about this. However, based on comparing the Location section of that page to the same section of the iPhone specs page, I think the 3G chipset is the same as the one in the iPhone--which means you'd get the true GPS chip with the 3G-enabled iPad.

So basically, if you want to take full advantage of those gorgeous maps, you'll need to pony up the $130 3G fee--because that fee buys you not only access to the AT&T 3G network, but a true GPS chip as well. Without the 3G chip, you get only an approximate location based on wireless device locations and a digital compass.

Video limitations: While the iPad can play 720p video, it can only output (at best) 576p and 480p--so no using your iPad to send the output of a 720p video to your high definition television. Related to this issue is the puzzling resolution of 1024x768--in a world where everything is headed to widescreen format, the iPad is reverting to the older 4x3 standard. Sure, it means apps that are run in double-size will fit the screen better, it means thicker black bars on pretty much every movie you watch.

To buy or not to buy

As I said up front, I really do like the new iPad. I'd love to buy one; it looks like an excellent surfing, e-mailing, and movie-watching machine. However, there are two show stoppers on the above list that mean I won't be purchasing the first-generation iPad: the lack of a video camera and chat capabilities, and the lack of Flash support. Without those two things at least, I will be reaching for the laptop more often than not, so I might as well just keep using that for my casual Web, e-mail and video chatting needs. But with just a couple little tweaks, I can certainly see an iPad in my future.

Apple Ipad Now What

SAN FRANCISCO (Hollywood Reporter) - After months of hype that reached a fever pitch in the past few weeks, Apple's new iPad is likely to underwhelm executives in Hollywood who had their fingers crossed that the sexy new tablet could be a game changer for film and TV studios.

Entertainment | Film

Instead, the slim gadget that enables the computing functions of a laptop while also incorporating a full-color e-reader offers little that's unique for Hollywood. When it comes to video programing, the iPad, for now, is just another home for buying and watching TV shows and movies through the iTunes store.

At the Yerba Buena Center on Wednesday, Apple Inc chief Steve Jobs showcased the iPad to hundreds of reporters but did not announce any television or film partnerships that would offer additional content, viewing opportunities or business models for Hollywood on the iPad.

However, the iPad is priced starting at $499, and with that sort of shockingly low cost, it could be widely adopted. After all, Apple has shipped 70 million iPhones and iTouches, underscoring the reach of iPad-esque devices.

If it becomes widely used, the iPad might boost the entertainment business slightly by encouraging more purchases of film and TV programs in the iTunes store. To date, the revenue from iTunes purchases, split at 70-30 favoring the programer, has been incremental for most programmers.

When the iPad is released in 60 days, consumers will be able to access thousands of TV shows and movies in the iTunes Store as well as any of the 140,000 apps in the app store, including TV-related ones such as USA's "Monk" or Fox's "So You Think You Can Dance."

When Jobs discussed the video capabilities of the device, he highlighted a high-def clip of a surfing dog from YouTube and showed how users can watch and buy TV shows like "Modern Family" and movies like the recent "Star Trek."

"We have movies and TV shows and music videos, so I can go into a TV show like 'Modern Family,' click an episode and watch it," he said, demonstrating how to click on a TV show. He then showed a clip from "Star Trek."

Other features on the iPad include a new app from the New York Times letting iPad users read and flip through the paper in a full-color experience.

In addition, the iPad also is an e-book reader that'll compete with Amazon's market leader Kindle. The iPad bookstore is called "iBooks" and is launching with five of the largest publishing houses, including the Hachette Book Group, Macmillan, Simon & Schuster, Penguin and HarperCollins. Books are visible on a full-color illustration of a bookshelf.

Jobs said Apple designed the device to handle all the functions of a laptop and smartphone, such as Web browsing, e-mail, watching videos and reading e-books. "It has to be better at these kinds of tasks than a laptop or smartphone otherwise it has no reason for being," he said.